The Case Study will be looking in detail into various abuses of authority by the officers operating at different levels within Together Housing Association Ltd. We will be looking at both the actions and the in-actions of officers from different departments who became involved at various levels. We will also look closely at the affects these official failures had on the tenants covered by this Case Study.
The three images below comprise some of the pieces of evidence which Ward Hadaway LLP (solicitors for Together Housing Association Ltd) managed to "alter" in, or "exclude" from the Court Bundles. The legal representative of a Social Housing Landlord somehow produced these deficient Bundles for three separate Court Hearings between 2021 and 2022. Each time a Bundle was produced for the Court these images were printed upside down, other pieces of evidence were totally absent from each Court Bundle, two spreadsheets had numerous pages interleaved to now present raw data not information to the judge. The spreadsheet pages at first appeared to me like they had been shuffled like a pack of cards. Their use to me in court hand been sabotaged, my evidence had been rendered useless.
A Data Controller "altering" "subject data" in this way or in any other way - is a breach of the Data Protection Act, apart from any other irregularity. As a consequence, I have reported to the ICO (Information Commissioners Office) for investigation the "alterations" and "omissions" of "evidence".
I have also contacted the SRA (Solicitors Regulatory Authority) regarding these irregularities which are probably a breach of professional conduct. I believe this contributed directly to me being given the Injunction for ASB in the County Court Bradford in July 2021.
More juicey images and gorey bits of malice, lies and scandal will follow soon. See PAGE TWO
Storyboard for staff training film: locating scenes = frames 1, 2 and 3
Alarmingly, the Case Study has identified rather large gaps in the existing "Safe Guarding" mechanisms. The Guide Lines form a legal requirement which "Registered Social Landlords" should follow. In this case, for some as yet unknown reason - they chose not to ! The framework is supposed to act as a "safety net" and it was put into place in order to protect vulnerable "service users" from abuse. The framework is detailed in both the Tenancy Agreement used by Together Housing Association Ltd, as well as in the Anti Social Behaviour Policy document. These documents clearly sets out the ASB procedures and how the Officers should implement the procedures. This is Together Housing Association Ltd's web page about Openness and Transparency
This unfortunate news highlights a principle route by which abuses of authority can take place undetected. At the County Court level, the existing legislation actually creates enclaves where abusive behaviour can take place and flourish.
The Case Study highlights some of the worst abuses of the system by tenants and housing officers, working in collusion to victimise other tenants in the block of flats.
Storyboard for staff training film: frames 4 and 5 - Detailed examination of the ASB Officer bullying a tenant.
The Case Study highlights the failures of Together Housing Association Ltd in the dereliction of their "duties of care". The Case Study documents the catalogue of incidents where the housing officers have knowingly failed to treat all tenants equally, which is also a breach of The Equalities Act.
The Case Study covers a four year period of Housing Officers failing to follow their employers procedures published in the Tenancy Agreement as well as in the Anti Social Behaviour Policy document. This Case Study exposes a failure of management at all levels, by the fact that NOT one of them ensured that their tenants were treated equally.
Storyboard for staff training film: frames 6 - ASB Officer bullying and ASB Manager Professional Negligence. Frames 7 and 8 Psychiatric Assessment.
The ASB Case Officer was relying wholly upon her knowledge and her experience, gained during 30 years as an ASB Officer, to exploit the flaws in the legal system. This is pretty extreme behaviour in an attempt to get the end result that the ASB Officer was looking for. Judges at County Court level will assume that the officer bringing the case is telling the truth. The judge will form their decision on, "likelihood" and "probability", it appears in preference to any evidence which the defence may bring to the court.
The same ASB Officer later attempted to have me committed to prison, citing several breaches of the Injunction, the main thrust being 8 incidents of breach because I had played acoustic guitar for 7 minutes around midday. I was found guilty of a breach - under my own admission of singing the Perjury Song. I have written more than ten versions of the Perjury Song which is about the ASB Officer having committed perjury.
Thankfully this judge realised there wasn't any evidence to support the Case Officer's attempt to have me sent to jail, as well as being evicted. However, he did find me guilty of breaching the Injunction because in his learned opinion "normal people don't go around singing". And we are supposed to respect such an ignorant and discriminatory opinion and the questionable outcome.
And so the Case Study will develop, along a sort of time line of events. However, because of potential legal ramifications of putting this information into the public realm, I will consider carefully the structure and development of this Case Study. So treat it like a living organism of sorts and watch the web site Case Study grow.
Updated with new gorey images of how the ASB Officer and her colleagues abused vulnerable tenants of Together Housing association Ltd.
Apart from any actual Case Study for the benefit of the Social Housing sector in the UK and Social Housing Landlords in particular.
Nameste - use the link to eMail David Urmston